« February 2008 | Main | April 2008 »

Saturday, 29 March 2008

Jamy Ian Swiss on YouTube

"I did a trick for a little boy. He was probably about 5 years old. Anyway, he looked up at me and said, 'I know how you did that.' I said, 'How?' He said, 'You used magic.' It's the best explanation I ever heard."

So said Al Cohen.

I've got a soft spot for magic.  And I look forward to when I can teach some simple magic to Edward.

Adam Gopnik has got an outstanding story about the current state of the magic industry/business/way of life/sub-culture in the March 17, 2008 issue of the New Yorker.

There's only an abstract available online here. One of the magicians featured in the lengthy article is Jamy Ian Swiss who is a specialist in close-up magic.  Card magic and the like.  Many people say he's the best at that there is.

Swiss is quoted in the article as (mainly) being opposed to magicians on YouTube.  So, I checked to see if he is on YouTube, and sure enough he is.  Probably unauthorised content.

Check him here, here.

Also, on his own website here.

Aside:  I read Steve Martin's recent memoir Born Standing Up - and his reverence for old-time magicians is quite touching.  Martin was no slouch in the magic stakes himself.

mucking around with the template again

My blog provider, typepad, are offering some limited edition blog templates provided by HP.

I thought I'd try them out, but as with most of the typepad templates, I'm finding the font size too small.

But because it's from HP - well, I just love the brand!

[ One of the consequences is that the layout of old blog posts gets a bit higgledy piggledy.  See how you go ....]

Friday, 28 March 2008

"Somebody is trying to use pro-Tibet themed emails to infect computers of the members of pro-Tibet groups to spy on their actions."

So says F-Secure in this piece.  It's well worth reading.

I have little interest in the pro-Tibet movement, so I'm likely neither to receive one of the targeted emails, nor to click on the contents - but it's educational to find out how these things are done.

The tip comes from my favourite security expert, Bruce Schneier. There's also a lively debate about the possible source of the malware in the comments to the blog post there.

Wednesday, 19 March 2008

Google Sky

Here's what it's about.

Here's what it looks like.

No, I should have put that around the other way.  Look at what it looks like first, then read what it's about.

Fantastic!

Monday, 17 March 2008

Why was HMAS Sydney (II) sunk?

The wreck of HMAS Sydney (II) has been found, and can be assumed to be the final resting place for most of her 645 crew.


The decades old query about why she was sunk has resurfaced and the controversy continues in an item from today's Sydney Morning Herald:

Professor Tom Frame, a former Anglican bishop to the Australian Defence Force and author of HMAS Sydney: Loss And Controversy, stepped into the latest row on Friday to defend the honour of the boat's commanding officer.

Dr Frame said Captain Joseph Burnett had been "terribly defamed" by a survivor from the Kormoran, the German armed merchant "raider" that on November 19, 1941, sank the Australian light cruiser in the Indian Ocean, killing all 645 crew.

Ludwig Ernst, 89, the president of the Kormoran Survivors' Association, told The West Australian newspaper that Burnett's actions during the fateful encounter were "incompetent" and "criminal".

"Eventually Australians will have to comprehend that the guilty party for Sydney's sinking is Captain Burnett," Mr Ernst said.

Well, what do the archives say?

Commander (later Captain) Emile Dechaineux was sent to Perth to coordinate the investigation and particularly the interrogation of the POW Kormoran survivors.  He arrived in Perth on 28 November 1941.

On 30 November 1941 Sir Dudley Pound the First Sea Lord of the Admiralty in London sent a signal to the Australian Commonwealth Naval Board:

When you have been able to collect from prisoners all available information regarding action between SYDNEY and raider, grateful if you would let me know what happened so that we can deduce any lessons for the future.

[ Naval War Diary, message 1st Sea Lord to ACNB, 1115A/30 November. Naval Historical Branch { from Captain Peter Hore's fine book HMAS Sydney II: The cruiser and the controversy in the archives of the United Kingdom}]

The response can be found in the National Archives of Australia as Interrogation of German survivors ex Raider 41 "Kormoran" [ NAA:  MP1049/5, 412871 ]

Here's page 4 of 36 pages from the online document:

Anaamp10495412871p4of36

This was sent to the Admiralty from the Naval Board on 23 December 1941.

At point number 1. close to the bottom of the page it states,  "CAPTAIN OF "SYDNEY" WAS DECEIVED AND PLACED HIMSELF IN TACTICALLY UNSOUND POSITION."

Anaamp10495412871p5of36 For the sake of completeness, here is the next page of the 2 page communique. (page 5 of the 36 page online document)

Anaamp10495412871p6of36 The file next shows Commander Dechaineux's draft, as an internal Minute Paper. (page 6 of 36 pages in the online document)

Anaamp10495412871p7of36 The next page of his draft (page 7 of 36 pages in the online document) has as the corresponding point number 1. in lessons learnt as:

1.  Captain of "SYDNEY" was deceived and placed himself in tactically unsound position.  The contributory cause of this is the admitted inefficiency of Merchant Ships in challenge and reply procedure.

We see also the signature Dechaineux at the bottom of the typescript.

There is another significant matter to consider.  The way in which the Official History of the Royal Australian Navy in WWII was written. The official naval war historian was Mr. G. Hermon Gill.  His two volume history is the starting point for any serious reader about WWII RAN naval history.

There's a very interesting correspondence relating to Gill's writing about the sinking of HMAS Sydney II, which has been highlighted by Richard Summerrell:

An interesting postscript to the official inquiries into the loss of the Sydney is revealed in the correspondence of R B M Long, the former Director of Naval Intelligence with G Hermon Gill, the official navy war historian in 1953. It appears that Gill referred to Long for his comments copies of his draft chapters of the official war history (including chapter 12, the chapter in which Gill deals with the loss of the Sydney).

In Long’s reply of 23 November 1953 he remarked that chapter 12 ‘is the best one you have done so far’. He went on to comment on Gill’s treatment of the story, particularly the conjecture as to why Burnett appeared to have put the Sydney in a position of vulnerability.

‘I think you handle the subject with great tact, very fairly and with literary skill. It is a part of the History that will be closely read and as Joe Burnett’s two sons are now rising in rank as Naval Officers it is important that they should be able to read that section without distress. I don’t know who it was who said that we all make mistakes and the man who doesn’t makes nothing. Burnett’s mistakes and the loss of the Sydney of course must be his responsibility (whether he happened to be sick or dead at the time of the action is of little consequence) and his reputation must be carried by his sons, but I think that you have given such a decent slant to the matter that they need never be even embarrassed.’

Commenting on other sections of the draft Long noted

‘The search for the Kormoran films commenced as a military expedition, certainly within six months of the Kormoran prisoners being put into stir. It continued intermittently until 1945... You probably know that I, personally, continued for over two years, a world search and on the flimsiest stories, for some indication as to the Sydney’s end. I well remember an expedition that was outfitted for me on the Gold Coast and bunged up country into Vichey/French Territory on a statement that some nine Germans, mostly officers, with two British prisoners, had gone inland from Dakar. I just can’t remember the full extent of the search but I remember it also took in Kerguelan [sic] and there was a case of the “Two Sailors” in the mountainous country back in Natal. It is correct to say that “not a stone was left unturned”.’

Part of Long’s response appears to have been used by Gill in the official history. At page 460, Gill states

‘Australian naval intelligence continued for some years a search for any information which would throw light on the fate of Sydney’s company. The flimsiest stories were followed up, and the search ranged from Central Africa to Kerguelen, but without success.

[ I have removed Richard Summerrell's footnotes from this excerpt, but the full text can be read online here. ]

SUMMARY

Firstly, Dechaineux's report on the sinking of HMAS Sydney, mainly arising from POW Kormoran survivor interrogations, stated that the Captain of HMAS Sydney was deceived and allowed himself to be placed in a tactically unsound position.

Secondly, the official historian was praised for writing about HMAS Sydney's demise so as not to cause distress or embarrassment to the sons of the Captain who were themselves in rising RAN careers.

 

Sunday, 16 March 2008

What was the Unknown Sailor of Christmas Island wearing? Part Four.

Part One was here.

Part Two was here.

Part Three was here.

Here I shall give online resources I have referenced and relied upon thus far.

With renewed interested in HMAS Sydney (II) consequent to announcement of the discovery of Kormoran's wreck together with battle debris belived to be from HMAS Sydney (II), this will assist some people landing on this  blog.

USEFUL LINKS about the Unknown Sailor of Christmas Island:

National Archives of Australia Recordsearch.

--------------------------------

Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, Completed Inquiry: The loss of HMAS Sydney, Report.

-------------------------------

The Sinking of HMAS Sydney A guide to Commonwealth Governement Records by Richard Summerrell (1999).

-------------------------------

ABC 7.30 report story 28 July 2000 - Govt agrees to fund search for Unknown Sailor.

--------------------------------

Australia's Forgotten Son by Glenys McDonald.

----------------------------------

Western Australian Museum HMAS Sydney reading list.

----------------------------------

An analysis of the HMAS Sydney / HSK Kormoran engagement.

----------------------------------

RAN History - Archives HMAS Sydney / Kormoran documents: Documents confiscated from repatriated Kormoran POWs afte there arrival in the UK on SS. Orontes.  RAN Naval Intelligence had sent a request to the RN to have the former prisoners searched upon arrival in the UK.

-------------------------------

RAN History archives summary of HMAS Sydney (II) and Kormoran - Lifeboat Workshop  23 - 24 APR 03.

-------------------------------

Australian Defence Report 3 October 2006 giving details of expedition to Christmas Island to locate the remains.

----------------------------------

Defence Media Briefing 26 October 2006, Remains of Unknown Sailor located on Christmas Island.

------------------------------

Defence online media room brief report including several photographs of the search for the remains, and relics deposited with the Australian War Memorial for analysis and safekeeping.

--------------------------------

Article from Defence Magazine issue November/December 2006 giving general summary of search status prior to the DNA analysis.

--------------------------------

Media release on 17 December 2006 by Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence: Findings of initial ballistics analysis relating to unkknown sailor.

----------------------------------

18 December 2006 ABC news story detailing the metal fragment in unknown sailor's remains was shrapnel, not a bullet as was first thought.

---------------------------------

Media release on 12 February 2007 by Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence detailing the metallurgical analysis of the shrapnel fragment found in the exhumed remains of the Unknown Sailor.

-------------------------------

Media release on 23 June 2007 by Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence detailing phase one of search for surviving relatives for DNA match and that the corpse had been wearing white overalls.

---------------------------------

Navy paper 12 July 2007 Bid to identify unknown sailor.

---------------------------------

Media release on 06 August 2007 by Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence detailing conclusion that the corpse had been wearing white overalls and phase two of search for survising relatives for DNA match.

----------------------------------------

The bone sailor - The Bulletin, September 4 2007, p.23

---------------------------------

Details of the Mutiny on Christmas Island in March 1941 and the Japanese invasion of the island.

--------------------------------

BBC Radio 4 podded broadcast of interview with the son of Captain Leonard Williams who was murdered during the Christmas Island mutiny in March 1941.

--------------------------------

Discussion forum entry by melliget (surely Martin Elliget a frequent corresspondent to Mackenaie Gregory) wherin he canvasses many identical questions which I have raised about the conflicting evidence regarding blue coveralls versus white coveralls.

--------------------------------

Digger History 3:  German Naval Uniforms.

--------------------------------

What was the Unknown Sailor of Christmas Island wearing? Part 3.

Part One was here.

Part Two was here.

Part Four is here.

Mr. J. W. Brown stated in May, 1949 that the Carley float held, "... the body of an engine room rating in blue overalls very much decomposed.

How would Mr. Brown have known the body had been an engine room rating in life?  Well, Christmas Island would have been visited by plenty of Royal Navy and Royal Australian Navy ships by 1941.  The corpse held no personal identification, so there must have been something about the clothing which led Mr. Brown to these two conclusions - that it was a "rating" (i.e. an enlisted rank or non-officer), and from the "engine room"

Edwardfeb252008_021 Let's look at naval engineering branch insignia.  The Royal Australian Navy used significantly the same badges to denote the engineering branch from 1911 to 1990.

A three-bladed propeller.

The upper example in the photograph was the printed type worn on overalls or boiler suit by Stokers.

Rnstokerbadgesj The badges at left are Royal Navy World War II era badges.  The pictures are from the useful website www.naval-history.net We can see that the Royal Navy's badges were similar to the RAN badges.

See also the written description here on page 137 of the Navy List.  Unsurprising given the close links between the two navies.

Both RN and RAN ships were visitors to Singapore and Christmas Island so it is quite likely that Mr. Brown was familiar with the enginering branch insignia.

Let's now consider which members of the crew aboard HMAS Sydney may have been wearing a blue boiler suit bleached white by exposure, with four or five press stud closures down the front.

My regular readers know that my preferred evidence is a first person accout, so I thought it may be useful to see what a couple of people I know who actually served aboard Royal Australian Navy ships during World War Two had to say on the topic of clothing they wore. My friend Mackenzie Gregory was a Sub-Lieutenant and Lieutenant RAN aboard Australia's three 8-inch gun cruisers HMAS Australia, HMAS Canberra and HMAS Shropshire for the duration of WWII (except for time off to complete his Lieutenant's course in the UK).

I asked Mac about WWII era RAN workclothes. He said,

- Engineering officers wore white overalls by convention. But in Shropshire I seem to recall that I wore a white type of overall at action stations, plus anti-flash gear and blue mae west life belt. See the attachement after I was rescued by Patterson.

- Stokers, ERA's wore blue overalls. (E.R.A. = engine room assistant)

- Overalls of no other colour were worn.

- Also think the sailors all wore a blue overall at action stations, plus anti flash gear and blue mae west life belt.

- By day we normally wore Khaki shorts and shirt.

My father was a Stoker, RAN aboard HMAS Shropshire during WWII, so had a different perspective on navy life. He said,

- He wore a blue coloured boiler suit made from a denim like material which when new was very stiff. Some other stokers wore pants made of the same material without a shirt due to the high temperature in the engine compartment.

- When I asked him if anyone aboard ship wore a white coloured boiler suit, he said that some fellow stokers bleached their blue boiler suits to soften them and make them more comfortable to wear.

- He said that he thinks that his boiler suit did NOT have press stud closures, instead it used buttons.

- He wore black leather boots.

What about the possibility that the Unknown Sailor of Christmas Island was a German, probably from the Kormoran?

In the media conference addressed by Captain Jim Parsons, Commander Matt Blenkin and Jo Button on 26 October 2006, the Q & A had this exchange:

REPORTER: So, to the team leader, just based on what you've discovered, what degree of probability would you say this sailor or this person who was buried, was actually from the Sydney ? What sort of level of probability would you put on it?

JIM PARSONS: I think you're bringing in some issues there where I can't draw a conclusion from, but the Defence Standing Committee drew the conclusion that on the balance of probability it was a sailor from HMAS Sydney . I think we have to accept that. What I have, is a strong belief that the person that we have recovered is the person that was recovered from the Carley raft in February 1942. I think the link is already made between that and the other part.

REPORTER: Just, is there any possibility that the sailor could be a German?

JIM PARSONS: It's not impossible and it would be interesting to theorise how he got into the Carley raft, but it's certainly not implausible. And this will be part of the process that we go through.

If the engine room sailor had been a german of the Kriegsmarine, he may have been wearing a patch like this one for the Maschinenlaufbahn, although the one pictured is known to have been in the U-boat service.

Br784_2 The military history website http://www.diggerhistory3.info/ has helpfully reproduced a copy of book produced in 1943 by the British Admiralty's Naval Intelligence Division.

Page30kriegsmarine_uniforms_3 If we look at page 30 from the book we see that the third row show a range of E.R.A. or Stoker badges, each having a 3-bladed propeller motif.

Onepiecesuit_2 And what of overalls or a boiler suit in the Kriegsmarine? Well page 28, section C.of the book says, "In small craft such as E-boats, a black leatherette and one-piece suit is often worn at sea. The lining is provided with elastic cuffs and ankle pieces, to keep out the water. The suit is closed by a zip-fastener."

That does not correspond to the boiler suit that the Uknown Sailor was wearing so, at present there seems no evidence that a Kormoran sailor may have worn a blue boiler suit or even a boiler suit at all.  More research into the uniforms of the Kormoran sailors and the Kriegsmarine will be needed.

We must also consider the latest information from the mettalurgical analysis of the shrpnel fragment found inside the skull of the Unknown Sailor after the 2006 exhumation 

In no account given by Kormoran survivors either during their wartime interrogation or after the war was there a desription or an instance of a German shell exploding and injuring one of the Kormoran's sailors.  A file comprising 491 pages exists in the nationa Archives of Australia as   'Kormoran'(Raider No. 41) - 'G'German AMC - Interrogation of Prisoners [ NAA: B6121, 734562 ] which may be viewed online via NAA's RecordSearch facility.

Additionally, on page 13 of 491 in that NAA file the inferrogation notes with Richard Emil Adolphe KOHLS, Chief Engineer, Kormoran contains this ,

"... In Indian ocean all wore only white clothes - weather was never really cold (below 10 degrees centigrade)... all wore warm clothes at night (except near Equator)."

Hence that appears to rule out that the Unknown Sailor was from the Kormoran.

We must now also consider other persons aboard who may have worn blue overalls.

In review,

- One eyewitness stated the Unknown Sailor was wearing a blue boiler suit bleached white by  exposure.  There were four plain press studs from neck to waist. 

- One of these witness said that the body was that of an "engine room rating" dressed in blue overalls.

- One eye witness stated the Uknown Sailor was wearing a white boiler suit.

-

Adelaide University has helpfully placed online an article titled Bone Sailor by Cheryl Jones in the September 4, 2007 issued of the now-defunct Bulletin Magazine.  The substantive contents of the article is an interview with Jeremy Austin of Adelaide University's Australian Centre for Ancient DNA  (ADAD).  Dr. Austin , Deputy Director of ACAD, is part of the team attempting to identify the Unknown Sailor.

     Austin read the unknown sailor's genetic code to work out his position on the global human family tree.  The man was of European descent but carried unusual mutaions that put him in the haplogroup J1, rare but widespread in Europe.  Haplogroups - twigs on the family tree - are big groups of people with a common ancestor.

     Austin says research on other sections of the genome would be needed to pin  the sailor's linage down to a place in Europe - another possible clue to his identity.

     The geneticist knows the tall sailor, who had a mouthful of gold fillings, well, but he won't be able to finish the story until he gets a DNA match.

We must also consider the RAAF members aboard HMAS Sydney who may have been wearing blue coveralls.

Next, in Part 4 I will list USEFUL LINKS.

 

.

Tuesday, 11 March 2008

The big gun of Mosman

Cimg2980 A couple of days ago we met our friends Alana, Sean and young Luca at a cafe on a headland above Mosman.  It's an amazing park with an amazing view. 

Cimg2989 Set on a site which was once an artillery emplacement used to protect Sydney and its harbour it has been refurbished to provide studios for artists and a setting for a sculpture park.

As a homage to the site's military past there is also a preserved inoperable 6-inch Mark VII coastal gun on display.  According to historical surveys, the two World War II era Mark VII guns were moved from this site to South Head so this one must have been retrieved for dramatic effect.

In this picture at left we see the 6-inch Mark VII gun which was manufactured by the venerable British armourer Vickers.  The "6-inch" statistic relates to the internal diameter of the gun barrel, and hence the external diameter of the projectile shell.  The shell weighed around 100 pounds (48 kg) and the range was about 15 kilometres.

Cimg2988 This photograph above gives a better idea of the gun's tactical field of fire, although this was not the exact position of the gun emplacement.  Sydney heads, the entrance to Sydney Harbour can be seen in the distance, North head at left, South Head at right.

Cimg2986 Edward has seen the big gun before, but it still acted like a magnet to him.  Not so much because he has an interest in things military like his Dad, but because it is just so big.  And because it now has a fence around it - just making it so much more attractive to a young boy.

Cimg2996 Ed also took some time out from military history to give vent to his artistic side and appreciate some sculpture.  Not so much from the aesthetic aspect as the athletic.

Saturday, 08 March 2008

The Luther Burger. Dying one bite at a time.

Kottke and Bauman were talking about burgers.

Apparently the Luther Burger is marketed as Baseball's best burger.

The sandwich has a hamburger patty topped with sharp chedder cheese and two slices of bacon with a sliced Krispy Kreme Original Glazed doughnut as the bun.

I think the public health authorities here would demand a health warning in large type anywhere these were sold.

Apparently a versoin of the Luther Burger is available in Google New York's cafeteria.

I thought Google had a Don't be evil ethos?

Here's the exact Google reference in case you're interested.

Sometimes my blog's referrer log keeps me awake at night.

Eleven years ago I was working for a large retail department store.  I received a telephone call from someone who said there was a bomb in the store, and in which room of the store the bomb was located. 

In my long career working in hotel and retail store security departments I had received several bomb threat telephone calls.  This call seemed different.  Amongst other things we did, the security team and I searched the room mentioned.  We found no bomb.  The caller rang back 15 minutes later and gave a more specific place to search.  Then we found the bomb.

The following day, as part of a complex extortion ploy, the bomber was caught by police.  Turns out he was following a scheme he had read about on the Internet describing how to extort money from a large business.   So, the bad things which can be found on the Internet are quite really dangerous.

Checking my blog statistics log today, I found this Google query for "bomb manufacture" brought someone to this blog's post about Churchill's cabinet meeting to discuss the H-Bomb.

That worries me.  Obviously nobody will learn how to carry out a criminal enterprise from this blog.  But they are looking.

My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad