Friday, 18 July 2008

Sydney then and now: Martin Place

Martin Place, Sydney.

Then:

SRONSWLayingDownTheTramTracks2679356246_801f32ee64_o


State Records NSW Digital ID: 17420_a014_a0140001110   "Construction of tram tracks at Martin Place, Sydney" (Photograph used with permission of the State Records Authority of New South Wales)

The photograph is undated, but the Holden motor car in the centre foreground of the photograph suggest that it was in the late 1940's to early 1950's.  General Post Office (GPO) Sydney is the substantial building in the right foreground. The air compressor in the right foreground looks like the same model used to construct the wharf at Bennelong Point in 1950.  However there were tram tracks along George Street in this position well before the 1940s, so this is probably a major track repair.

The Cenotaph can be seen in the centre of Martin Place, in the middle distance behend the tree.


and Now:

CIMG3637



















Sunday, 06 July 2008

John McCain III in Truc Bach Lake

I came across this picture of John McCain being captured during the Vietnam War on the Big Picture blog.

I've seen hundreds of photographs of McCain and Obama, but I've never  seen this one before.

I'm not endorsing McCain (as if my opinion mattered) and not not endorsing him either.  It's just an interesting moment in military history.

The photo is from the Library of Congress, and appears as part of their Veterans History Project where McCain was interviewed, mainly about his captivity where he spent more than five long years in a hell hole.

McCainDowned

John McCain (center) being captured by Vietnamese civilians in Truc Bach Lake near Hanoi Vietnam [ Library of Congress ]

Here's his interview with the Veteran's History Project

Friday, 25 April 2008

ANZAC Day - Lest We Forget.

2001_dawn_101_15a ANZAC Day is one of Australia's national days of mourning for those who fell in war. 

We mark it on 25 April each year.  Throughout the land, in big cities and small towns people will gather today at a war memorial, cenotaph or cemetery - and remember.

A beautiful and moving tribute:

Their name liveth for evermore.

Saturday, 19 April 2008

A mystery ship: H.M.S. Undine (<1901 version)

I love the composition of this photo.

Hmsundine It shows H.M.S. Undine in Sydney Harbour taken through an archway of Fort Macquarie.  (Tyrrell Photographic Collection, Powerhouse Museum) Construction of Fort Macquarie commenced in 1817 and was completed by our great colonial architect Francis Greenway in 1821.  It stood until it was demolised in 1901 to make way for an electric tramway at Bennelong Point.  Australian readers will be familiar with the site, and the rest of the world knows it as the Sydney Opera House.

Now, the ship is H.M.S. Undine.  My internet searches thus far have turned up a Royal Navy submarine H.M.S. Undine (N48) which was launched in 1937 and a destroyer H.M.S. Undine (R42) which was launched in 1943.  But I can find little about Sailing Schooner H.M.S. Undine except for this photograph and one other photograph about a gathering of ships in Sydney Harbour during 1887 to celebrate the jubilee of Queen Victoria's reign.

I think I'll have to ask my friend Mac Gregory if he knows anything about the schooner H.M.S. Undine.

Added:

Mac Gregory has supplied some useful information indicating that the HMS Undine pictured above was a schooner previously in civilian service as Morna.  She was purchased by the Royal Navy in 1881 and sold in 1888. 

Therefore, the photograph above dates from between 1881 and 1888.

Here's Mac's reply to me, slightly edited;

Here is all I can find about HM ships that carried the name of Undine.

Number 3 in the list below is the only one that seems to fit, according to the Queensland papers she was still in service on March 10, 1888.

Lovely photo of her, the photographer Henry King was around 1880-1900.

HMS Undine From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Eight ships of the Royal Navy have borne the name HMS Undine, after the Ondines of mythology:

HMS Undine was an iron paddle packet purchased in 1847 and sold in 1854.

HMS Undine was to have been a wood screw gunvessel. She was laid down in 1861 but was cancelled in 1863.

HMS Undine was a schooner, previously in civilian service as the Morna. She was purchased in 1881 and was sold in 1888.

HMS Undine was a coastguard vessel, previously named HMS Hawk. She was renamed HMS Undine in 1904 and was sold in 1906.

HMS Undine was a base ship, previously named HMS Wildfire. She had been launched in 1884 for civilian servce, at first as Hiawatha and then as Mizeppa. She was purchased by the Navy in 1888 as a screw yacht tender and renamed HMS Wildfire. She was converted to a base ship in 1889 and was renamed HMS Undine in 1907, before being sold in 1912.

HMS Undine was an R class destroyer launched in 1917 and sold in 1928. She was then wrecked later that year and the wreck sold for breaking up.

HMS Undine was a U class submarine launched in 1937 and sunk in 1940.

HMS Undine was a U class destroyer launched in 1943. She was converted into a Type 15 frigate between 1952 and 1954 and was broken up in 1965.

From the Toowoomba Chronicle and Darling Downs General Advertiser, Saturday, March 10, 1888:

Only about six months ago Mr. and Mrs. John Brannelly left Brisbane on a visit to the old country. Our last issue contained a telegram announcing Mrs. Brannelly's sudden death on board the Iberia, just after the vessel had left the Melbourne Heads. Mr. John Brannelly is well known to many in Toowoomba, having been an innkeeper here for some years. The following account of Mrs. Brannelly's funeral we take from Wednesday's S.M. Herald: - The funeral of Mrs. Brannelly, who died so suddenly on board the R.M.S. Iberia when on her way from Melbourne to Sydney, took place yesterday morning. The facts of the case, which are still fresh in the minds of most people, may be briefly recapitulated. Mrs. Brannelly and her husband had been on a visit to Europe, and were returning home to Brisbane. About 9 p.m. on Saturday last, shortly after the Iberia had left Melbourne, Mrs. Brannelly was suddenly missed, and upon a search being instituted she was found in one of the cabins dead. Her death cast quite a gloom over the whole ship, for the deceased lady had made friends of all on board by her affable and winning ways, both in the saloon and out of it, consequently out of respect to the deceased a large number of people accompanied the body to its last resting place; among whom were noticeable Mr. Birrell, chief officer of the Iberia, Mr. Cook, the purser, Dr. Kerr, and the fourth officer, also the Rev. and Mrs. Mitten of Durham, England, who were fellow passengers. Mr. Stolterfoht, Mr. Brannelly, and four tars of the Iberia, also attended. The corpse left the Iberia shortly before 11 o'clock for Man of war steps. Upon passing H.M.S. Undine, that vessel brought her flags down to half mast. The body was interred at the Waverley cemetery. The deceased had been during the voyage under the doctor's care, but it was not thought that anything serious was the matter. Heart disease is believed to be the primary cause of the unfortunate occurrence.

Thanks Mac! 

Wednesday, 02 April 2008

The date that HMAS Perth (I) was sunk.

Slinger Wood asked me on which date was HMAS Perth (I) sunk.  I told Slinger that the Royal Australian Navy sea power ship's history site has the HMAS Perth (I) as being sunk at around 0025 hours on 1 March 1942; and the Australian War Memorial online encyclopedia has the sinking taking place at around 12.25am on 1 March 1942.

Well, what do the archives say?

Whilst there are several documents at the National Archives of Australia relating to the sinking, none are available to be viewed online.

However, the RAN service card of the ship's captain, Captain Hector M. L. Waller, DSO and Bar, is available, and does record the date he perished with the ship.

It's available in the National Archives of Australia as item [ NAA: A6769, 5220053 ]

The file has seven pages, here is page 2 (click on picture for enlargement):

Awallernaa5220053p2of7 We note he lived in Port Melbourne, and entered the  RAN college at the age of 13 years.

On the reverse of the card, page 3, we see the saddening notation at the bottom right hand corner:

Awallernaa5220053p3of7 "Missing with HMAS Perth 1st March 1942

Presumed killed in action 1/3/42"

So, the record shows that HMAS Perth (I) was sunk on 1 March 1942.

Here is Captain Waller's entry on the Australian War Memorial's Roll of Honour:

Hector Macdonald Laws Waller DSO & BAR

Rank
Captain [Capt]
Unit
HMAS Perth
Service
RAN
Conflict
1939-1945
Date of Death
1 March 1942
Source
AWM146 Roll of Honour cards, 1939-1945 War, Royal Australian Navy

Monday, 17 March 2008

Why was HMAS Sydney (II) sunk?

The wreck of HMAS Sydney (II) has been found, and can be assumed to be the final resting place for most of her 645 crew.


The decades old query about why she was sunk has resurfaced and the controversy continues in an item from today's Sydney Morning Herald:

Professor Tom Frame, a former Anglican bishop to the Australian Defence Force and author of HMAS Sydney: Loss And Controversy, stepped into the latest row on Friday to defend the honour of the boat's commanding officer.

Dr Frame said Captain Joseph Burnett had been "terribly defamed" by a survivor from the Kormoran, the German armed merchant "raider" that on November 19, 1941, sank the Australian light cruiser in the Indian Ocean, killing all 645 crew.

Ludwig Ernst, 89, the president of the Kormoran Survivors' Association, told The West Australian newspaper that Burnett's actions during the fateful encounter were "incompetent" and "criminal".

"Eventually Australians will have to comprehend that the guilty party for Sydney's sinking is Captain Burnett," Mr Ernst said.

Well, what do the archives say?

Commander (later Captain) Emile Dechaineux was sent to Perth to coordinate the investigation and particularly the interrogation of the POW Kormoran survivors.  He arrived in Perth on 28 November 1941.

On 30 November 1941 Sir Dudley Pound the First Sea Lord of the Admiralty in London sent a signal to the Australian Commonwealth Naval Board:

When you have been able to collect from prisoners all available information regarding action between SYDNEY and raider, grateful if you would let me know what happened so that we can deduce any lessons for the future.

[ Naval War Diary, message 1st Sea Lord to ACNB, 1115A/30 November. Naval Historical Branch { from Captain Peter Hore's fine book HMAS Sydney II: The cruiser and the controversy in the archives of the United Kingdom}]

The response can be found in the National Archives of Australia as Interrogation of German survivors ex Raider 41 "Kormoran" [ NAA:  MP1049/5, 412871 ]

Here's page 4 of 36 pages from the online document:

Anaamp10495412871p4of36

This was sent to the Admiralty from the Naval Board on 23 December 1941.

At point number 1. close to the bottom of the page it states,  "CAPTAIN OF "SYDNEY" WAS DECEIVED AND PLACED HIMSELF IN TACTICALLY UNSOUND POSITION."

Anaamp10495412871p5of36 For the sake of completeness, here is the next page of the 2 page communique. (page 5 of the 36 page online document)

Anaamp10495412871p6of36 The file next shows Commander Dechaineux's draft, as an internal Minute Paper. (page 6 of 36 pages in the online document)

Anaamp10495412871p7of36 The next page of his draft (page 7 of 36 pages in the online document) has as the corresponding point number 1. in lessons learnt as:

1.  Captain of "SYDNEY" was deceived and placed himself in tactically unsound position.  The contributory cause of this is the admitted inefficiency of Merchant Ships in challenge and reply procedure.

We see also the signature Dechaineux at the bottom of the typescript.

There is another significant matter to consider.  The way in which the Official History of the Royal Australian Navy in WWII was written. The official naval war historian was Mr. G. Hermon Gill.  His two volume history is the starting point for any serious reader about WWII RAN naval history.

There's a very interesting correspondence relating to Gill's writing about the sinking of HMAS Sydney II, which has been highlighted by Richard Summerrell:

An interesting postscript to the official inquiries into the loss of the Sydney is revealed in the correspondence of R B M Long, the former Director of Naval Intelligence with G Hermon Gill, the official navy war historian in 1953. It appears that Gill referred to Long for his comments copies of his draft chapters of the official war history (including chapter 12, the chapter in which Gill deals with the loss of the Sydney).

In Long’s reply of 23 November 1953 he remarked that chapter 12 ‘is the best one you have done so far’. He went on to comment on Gill’s treatment of the story, particularly the conjecture as to why Burnett appeared to have put the Sydney in a position of vulnerability.

‘I think you handle the subject with great tact, very fairly and with literary skill. It is a part of the History that will be closely read and as Joe Burnett’s two sons are now rising in rank as Naval Officers it is important that they should be able to read that section without distress. I don’t know who it was who said that we all make mistakes and the man who doesn’t makes nothing. Burnett’s mistakes and the loss of the Sydney of course must be his responsibility (whether he happened to be sick or dead at the time of the action is of little consequence) and his reputation must be carried by his sons, but I think that you have given such a decent slant to the matter that they need never be even embarrassed.’

Commenting on other sections of the draft Long noted

‘The search for the Kormoran films commenced as a military expedition, certainly within six months of the Kormoran prisoners being put into stir. It continued intermittently until 1945... You probably know that I, personally, continued for over two years, a world search and on the flimsiest stories, for some indication as to the Sydney’s end. I well remember an expedition that was outfitted for me on the Gold Coast and bunged up country into Vichey/French Territory on a statement that some nine Germans, mostly officers, with two British prisoners, had gone inland from Dakar. I just can’t remember the full extent of the search but I remember it also took in Kerguelan [sic] and there was a case of the “Two Sailors” in the mountainous country back in Natal. It is correct to say that “not a stone was left unturned”.’

Part of Long’s response appears to have been used by Gill in the official history. At page 460, Gill states

‘Australian naval intelligence continued for some years a search for any information which would throw light on the fate of Sydney’s company. The flimsiest stories were followed up, and the search ranged from Central Africa to Kerguelen, but without success.

[ I have removed Richard Summerrell's footnotes from this excerpt, but the full text can be read online here. ]

SUMMARY

Firstly, Dechaineux's report on the sinking of HMAS Sydney, mainly arising from POW Kormoran survivor interrogations, stated that the Captain of HMAS Sydney was deceived and allowed himself to be placed in a tactically unsound position.

Secondly, the official historian was praised for writing about HMAS Sydney's demise so as not to cause distress or embarrassment to the sons of the Captain who were themselves in rising RAN careers.

 

Sunday, 16 March 2008

What was the Unknown Sailor of Christmas Island wearing? Part Four.

Part One was here.

Part Two was here.

Part Three was here.

Here I shall give online resources I have referenced and relied upon thus far.

With renewed interested in HMAS Sydney (II) consequent to announcement of the discovery of Kormoran's wreck together with battle debris belived to be from HMAS Sydney (II), this will assist some people landing on this  blog.

USEFUL LINKS about the Unknown Sailor of Christmas Island:

National Archives of Australia Recordsearch.

--------------------------------

Joint Standing Committee on Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade, Completed Inquiry: The loss of HMAS Sydney, Report.

-------------------------------

The Sinking of HMAS Sydney A guide to Commonwealth Governement Records by Richard Summerrell (1999).

-------------------------------

ABC 7.30 report story 28 July 2000 - Govt agrees to fund search for Unknown Sailor.

--------------------------------

Australia's Forgotten Son by Glenys McDonald.

----------------------------------

Western Australian Museum HMAS Sydney reading list.

----------------------------------

An analysis of the HMAS Sydney / HSK Kormoran engagement.

----------------------------------

RAN History - Archives HMAS Sydney / Kormoran documents: Documents confiscated from repatriated Kormoran POWs afte there arrival in the UK on SS. Orontes.  RAN Naval Intelligence had sent a request to the RN to have the former prisoners searched upon arrival in the UK.

-------------------------------

RAN History archives summary of HMAS Sydney (II) and Kormoran - Lifeboat Workshop  23 - 24 APR 03.

-------------------------------

Australian Defence Report 3 October 2006 giving details of expedition to Christmas Island to locate the remains.

----------------------------------

Defence Media Briefing 26 October 2006, Remains of Unknown Sailor located on Christmas Island.

------------------------------

Defence online media room brief report including several photographs of the search for the remains, and relics deposited with the Australian War Memorial for analysis and safekeeping.

--------------------------------

Article from Defence Magazine issue November/December 2006 giving general summary of search status prior to the DNA analysis.

--------------------------------

Media release on 17 December 2006 by Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence: Findings of initial ballistics analysis relating to unkknown sailor.

----------------------------------

18 December 2006 ABC news story detailing the metal fragment in unknown sailor's remains was shrapnel, not a bullet as was first thought.

---------------------------------

Media release on 12 February 2007 by Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence detailing the metallurgical analysis of the shrapnel fragment found in the exhumed remains of the Unknown Sailor.

-------------------------------

Media release on 23 June 2007 by Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence detailing phase one of search for surviving relatives for DNA match and that the corpse had been wearing white overalls.

---------------------------------

Navy paper 12 July 2007 Bid to identify unknown sailor.

---------------------------------

Media release on 06 August 2007 by Minister Assisting the Minister for Defence detailing conclusion that the corpse had been wearing white overalls and phase two of search for survising relatives for DNA match.

----------------------------------------

The bone sailor - The Bulletin, September 4 2007, p.23

---------------------------------

Details of the Mutiny on Christmas Island in March 1941 and the Japanese invasion of the island.

--------------------------------

BBC Radio 4 podded broadcast of interview with the son of Captain Leonard Williams who was murdered during the Christmas Island mutiny in March 1941.

--------------------------------

Discussion forum entry by melliget (surely Martin Elliget a frequent corresspondent to Mackenaie Gregory) wherin he canvasses many identical questions which I have raised about the conflicting evidence regarding blue coveralls versus white coveralls.

--------------------------------

Digger History 3:  German Naval Uniforms.

--------------------------------

What was the Unknown Sailor of Christmas Island wearing? Part 3.

Part One was here.

Part Two was here.

Part Four is here.

Mr. J. W. Brown stated in May, 1949 that the Carley float held, "... the body of an engine room rating in blue overalls very much decomposed.

How would Mr. Brown have known the body had been an engine room rating in life?  Well, Christmas Island would have been visited by plenty of Royal Navy and Royal Australian Navy ships by 1941.  The corpse held no personal identification, so there must have been something about the clothing which led Mr. Brown to these two conclusions - that it was a "rating" (i.e. an enlisted rank or non-officer), and from the "engine room"

Edwardfeb252008_021 Let's look at naval engineering branch insignia.  The Royal Australian Navy used significantly the same badges to denote the engineering branch from 1911 to 1990.

A three-bladed propeller.

The upper example in the photograph was the printed type worn on overalls or boiler suit by Stokers.

Rnstokerbadgesj The badges at left are Royal Navy World War II era badges.  The pictures are from the useful website www.naval-history.net We can see that the Royal Navy's badges were similar to the RAN badges.

See also the written description here on page 137 of the Navy List.  Unsurprising given the close links between the two navies.

Both RN and RAN ships were visitors to Singapore and Christmas Island so it is quite likely that Mr. Brown was familiar with the enginering branch insignia.

Let's now consider which members of the crew aboard HMAS Sydney may have been wearing a blue boiler suit bleached white by exposure, with four or five press stud closures down the front.

My regular readers know that my preferred evidence is a first person accout, so I thought it may be useful to see what a couple of people I know who actually served aboard Royal Australian Navy ships during World War Two had to say on the topic of clothing they wore. My friend Mackenzie Gregory was a Sub-Lieutenant and Lieutenant RAN aboard Australia's three 8-inch gun cruisers HMAS Australia, HMAS Canberra and HMAS Shropshire for the duration of WWII (except for time off to complete his Lieutenant's course in the UK).

I asked Mac about WWII era RAN workclothes. He said,

- Engineering officers wore white overalls by convention. But in Shropshire I seem to recall that I wore a white type of overall at action stations, plus anti-flash gear and blue mae west life belt. See the attachement after I was rescued by Patterson.

- Stokers, ERA's wore blue overalls. (E.R.A. = engine room assistant)

- Overalls of no other colour were worn.

- Also think the sailors all wore a blue overall at action stations, plus anti flash gear and blue mae west life belt.

- By day we normally wore Khaki shorts and shirt.

My father was a Stoker, RAN aboard HMAS Shropshire during WWII, so had a different perspective on navy life. He said,

- He wore a blue coloured boiler suit made from a denim like material which when new was very stiff. Some other stokers wore pants made of the same material without a shirt due to the high temperature in the engine compartment.

- When I asked him if anyone aboard ship wore a white coloured boiler suit, he said that some fellow stokers bleached their blue boiler suits to soften them and make them more comfortable to wear.

- He said that he thinks that his boiler suit did NOT have press stud closures, instead it used buttons.

- He wore black leather boots.

What about the possibility that the Unknown Sailor of Christmas Island was a German, probably from the Kormoran?

In the media conference addressed by Captain Jim Parsons, Commander Matt Blenkin and Jo Button on 26 October 2006, the Q & A had this exchange:

REPORTER: So, to the team leader, just based on what you've discovered, what degree of probability would you say this sailor or this person who was buried, was actually from the Sydney ? What sort of level of probability would you put on it?

JIM PARSONS: I think you're bringing in some issues there where I can't draw a conclusion from, but the Defence Standing Committee drew the conclusion that on the balance of probability it was a sailor from HMAS Sydney . I think we have to accept that. What I have, is a strong belief that the person that we have recovered is the person that was recovered from the Carley raft in February 1942. I think the link is already made between that and the other part.

REPORTER: Just, is there any possibility that the sailor could be a German?

JIM PARSONS: It's not impossible and it would be interesting to theorise how he got into the Carley raft, but it's certainly not implausible. And this will be part of the process that we go through.

If the engine room sailor had been a german of the Kriegsmarine, he may have been wearing a patch like this one for the Maschinenlaufbahn, although the one pictured is known to have been in the U-boat service.

Br784_2 The military history website http://www.diggerhistory3.info/ has helpfully reproduced a copy of book produced in 1943 by the British Admiralty's Naval Intelligence Division.

Page30kriegsmarine_uniforms_3 If we look at page 30 from the book we see that the third row show a range of E.R.A. or Stoker badges, each having a 3-bladed propeller motif.

Onepiecesuit_2 And what of overalls or a boiler suit in the Kriegsmarine? Well page 28, section C.of the book says, "In small craft such as E-boats, a black leatherette and one-piece suit is often worn at sea. The lining is provided with elastic cuffs and ankle pieces, to keep out the water. The suit is closed by a zip-fastener."

That does not correspond to the boiler suit that the Uknown Sailor was wearing so, at present there seems no evidence that a Kormoran sailor may have worn a blue boiler suit or even a boiler suit at all.  More research into the uniforms of the Kormoran sailors and the Kriegsmarine will be needed.

We must also consider the latest information from the mettalurgical analysis of the shrpnel fragment found inside the skull of the Unknown Sailor after the 2006 exhumation 

In no account given by Kormoran survivors either during their wartime interrogation or after the war was there a desription or an instance of a German shell exploding and injuring one of the Kormoran's sailors.  A file comprising 491 pages exists in the nationa Archives of Australia as   'Kormoran'(Raider No. 41) - 'G'German AMC - Interrogation of Prisoners [ NAA: B6121, 734562 ] which may be viewed online via NAA's RecordSearch facility.

Additionally, on page 13 of 491 in that NAA file the inferrogation notes with Richard Emil Adolphe KOHLS, Chief Engineer, Kormoran contains this ,

"... In Indian ocean all wore only white clothes - weather was never really cold (below 10 degrees centigrade)... all wore warm clothes at night (except near Equator)."

Hence that appears to rule out that the Unknown Sailor was from the Kormoran.

We must now also consider other persons aboard who may have worn blue overalls.

In review,

- One eyewitness stated the Unknown Sailor was wearing a blue boiler suit bleached white by  exposure.  There were four plain press studs from neck to waist. 

- One of these witness said that the body was that of an "engine room rating" dressed in blue overalls.

- One eye witness stated the Uknown Sailor was wearing a white boiler suit.

-

Adelaide University has helpfully placed online an article titled Bone Sailor by Cheryl Jones in the September 4, 2007 issued of the now-defunct Bulletin Magazine.  The substantive contents of the article is an interview with Jeremy Austin of Adelaide University's Australian Centre for Ancient DNA  (ADAD).  Dr. Austin , Deputy Director of ACAD, is part of the team attempting to identify the Unknown Sailor.

     Austin read the unknown sailor's genetic code to work out his position on the global human family tree.  The man was of European descent but carried unusual mutaions that put him in the haplogroup J1, rare but widespread in Europe.  Haplogroups - twigs on the family tree - are big groups of people with a common ancestor.

     Austin says research on other sections of the genome would be needed to pin  the sailor's linage down to a place in Europe - another possible clue to his identity.

     The geneticist knows the tall sailor, who had a mouthful of gold fillings, well, but he won't be able to finish the story until he gets a DNA match.

We must also consider the RAAF members aboard HMAS Sydney who may have been wearing blue coveralls.

Next, in Part 4 I will list USEFUL LINKS.

 

.

Tuesday, 11 March 2008

The big gun of Mosman

Cimg2980 A couple of days ago we met our friends Alana, Sean and young Luca at a cafe on a headland above Mosman.  It's an amazing park with an amazing view. 

Cimg2989 Set on a site which was once an artillery emplacement used to protect Sydney and its harbour it has been refurbished to provide studios for artists and a setting for a sculpture park.

As a homage to the site's military past there is also a preserved inoperable 6-inch Mark VII coastal gun on display.  According to historical surveys, the two World War II era Mark VII guns were moved from this site to South Head so this one must have been retrieved for dramatic effect.

In this picture at left we see the 6-inch Mark VII gun which was manufactured by the venerable British armourer Vickers.  The "6-inch" statistic relates to the internal diameter of the gun barrel, and hence the external diameter of the projectile shell.  The shell weighed around 100 pounds (48 kg) and the range was about 15 kilometres.

Cimg2988 This photograph above gives a better idea of the gun's tactical field of fire, although this was not the exact position of the gun emplacement.  Sydney heads, the entrance to Sydney Harbour can be seen in the distance, North head at left, South Head at right.

Cimg2986 Edward has seen the big gun before, but it still acted like a magnet to him.  Not so much because he has an interest in things military like his Dad, but because it is just so big.  And because it now has a fence around it - just making it so much more attractive to a young boy.

Cimg2996 Ed also took some time out from military history to give vent to his artistic side and appreciate some sculpture.  Not so much from the aesthetic aspect as the athletic.

Tuesday, 04 March 2008

What was the Unknown Sailor of Christmas Island wearing? Part Two.

Part One appeared here.

Part Three is here.

Part Four is here.

The holdings of the National Archives of Australia (NAA) on matters related to the disappearance of HMAS Sydney (II) are vast.  They have also been trawled by many professional and amateur historians.

Cimg1279 Let's concentrate here on what the archives have to show us about what the Unknown Sailor was wearing when he was found floating in a Carley raft off Christmas Island on 6 February, 1942.  (The photograph at left shows a Carley float typical of the period.  This one was from HMAS Shropshire.)

Mr. Richard Summerrell, then Assistant Director of the NAA in 1997 produced a guide to Commonwealth Government Records on this matter called The Sinking of HMAS Sydney (ISBN 0 642 34412), and it is available online here.  this guide is a very significant work of research in its own right.

Naabarcode216986page1 The eyewitness accounts of the recovery of the Carley float/raft off Christmas Island are contained in the NAA as reference  [ NAA: AA1980/700, NID 194/222 ]   "Carley float and Corpse Recovered Off Christmas Island."    It is available for viewing online at the NAA website via the "Recordsearch feature."      Images of this file follow, which I have downloaded from the NAA site as Bitmap images and then converted to JPEG.  Technically, there was some image compression required to load onto this blog, so if you want the higher resolution image you will need to go to the NAA site.

In early May, 1949 Mr. J. W. Brown was staying at the Carlton Hotel, Perth, Western Australia and made contact with Mr. J. K. Atkinson of the West Australian newspaper.  Mr. J. W. Brown had been a resident on Christmas Island at the time of the recovery of the Unknown Sailor in February 1942.

And who was Mr. Brown?  According to the Parliamentary report section 7.53, he was former Sergeant of the Christmas Island Platoon of the Singapore Volunteers.

Naabarcode_216986page6jpeg Mr. Brown's statement included this,

"... It was a Carley raft with one body on board, the body of an engine room rating in blue overalls very much decomposed.  Seabirds from above and fish from below had done their share to make identification impossible.  A pair of boots was also on the raft which our resident medical officer said could not have been worn by the dead man, this led us to believe that there may have been others on the raft.  ...."   (my emphasis added)

"

Mr. Atkinson of the West Australian went to the Naval Staff Office in Fremantle, West Australia and sought comment.  The Naval Officer In Charge at Fremantle sent his own agent to interview Mr. Brown.  Mr. Brown was at that time absent, so his wife was interviewed, and she substantiated that they were residents of Christmas Island in February, 1942. 

Naabarcode_216986page5jpeg The Naval O.I.C. then, on 4 May, 1949 sent a letter to the Director of Naval Intelligence in Navy Office Melbourne seeking confirmation of any facts.

In February and March 1942 Christmas Island was in turmoil.  The Japanese military were advancing.  On 7 March the Japanese shelled the island.  On 11 March the 27 Indian troops staged a mutiny murdering Captain Leonard Williams and four British NCOs , all part of the British Army garrison who were to protect the island.  On 31 March 1942 the Japanese invaded the island, interning the Europeans, including Tom Pearson Cromwell  (District Officer).

On 23 February 1942, the Naval Staff Officer (Intelligence) compiled Shipping Intelligence Report No. 137/1942.  Of note was that the ship S/S Islander had arrived in port.

Naabarcode_216986page7jpeg "The "ISLANDER" brought a total of 48 evacuee passengers from Christmas Island.  From Captain J. R. Smith, Harbour Master from the Island, the following information, which throws further light on the report by J. C. BAKER (reference "HERMION" in this report), was gathered.

... The corpse was clothed in a boiler suit which had originally been blue, but was bleached white by exposure.  There were four plain press studs from neck to waist.  "

Naabarcode_216986page9jpeg Here is another page from the Shipping Intelligence Report No. 137/1942 relating to the visit of M/V/ "HERMION" to port.

"On board this vessel were J. C. Baker and wife, passengers from Christmas Island.  Mr. Baker, for the last six years, has been in charge of the Radio Station at Christmas Island.  ...

"The corpse was clothed in a white boiler suit, the pockets were empty and there was nothing to establish identity.   the Shore doctor established that the body was that of a white man.  All the flesh was gone from the right arm, also the eyes and nose were missing.  Otherwise the corpse was decomposed in parts. ..."

Here we have a conflict between the accounts of Smith and Baker concerning the colour of the boiler suit worn by the Unknown Sailor.

Smith said, " ... boiler suit which had originally been blue, but was bleached white by exposure."

Baker said, " ... a white boiler suit ..."

Well, the Naval Staff Officer (Intelligence) wrote about this conflict, " ... without any suggestion of discrediting Baker's statements, which were given in good faith, it is suggested that those made by Captain Smith should prove the more reliable."

Naabarcode216986page3jpeg In response to the request for information from the Naval Officer In Charge at Fremantle, the Director of Naval Intelligence, who was then Captain, later Rear Admiral George C. Oldham wrote to the RAN's Director of Victualling and Director of Naval Stores seeking remarks on paragraphs 3 (a), (b) and (c) of the W.A. Shipping Intelligence Report No 137/1942.

I cannot tell from my reading of the NAA's online file if the whole of W. A. Shipping Intelligence Report No 137/1942 was forward for reading and consideration by the D. of V. and the D. N. S. , or merely the page containing the account of Mr. Baker, which stated that the corpse was wearing " ...a white boiler suit." The fact that the D. of V. has commented on the topic of "pressed studs" and "press studs" infers that he also read the account of Smith who said, "there were four plain press buttons from neck to waist."

The Director of Naval Stores (D.N.S.) has replied ,

" Regarding Par 3(a), the boiler suit does not coincide with ratings' type stocked in R.A.N.  as pressed studs had [ illegible  words ] been adopted.  A naval rating may have worn the type described although not officially uniform.  R.A.N. officers purchased their own or had them made up privately. White & brown in colour [illegible word] press studs.

2. The markings on the shoes described by Captain J. R. Smith as underlined in blue pencil definitely correspond with supplies from our stores, provided they were leather not canvas shoes. I should think they had been supplied to an officer or rating."

  Let's look at the conclusions which were made by Captain G. C. Oldham, the Director of Naval Intelligence.  He replied to the Naval Officer in Charge at Fremantle on 2 August, 1949:

Naa_barcode_216986page2jpeg

Captain Oldham concluded that the clothing could have been that of an R.A.N. rating, but that the Carley float did not belong to an H.M.A. Ship.

Captain Oldham's conclusion about the origin of the Carley float is now believed to be incorrect.  Based upon substantial further evidence which Oldham did not have at his disposal, the Joint Parliamentary Committee drew the conclusion that the Carley float may well have come from an H.M.A. Ship. See the report sections 7.8 through 7.50.

SUMMARY

One eyewitness in 1942 said that the Unknown Sailor was wearing a blue boiler suit which had been bleached white by exposure to the sun.

One eyewitness in 1942 said that the Unknown Sailor was wearing a white boiler suit.

One eyewitness in 1949 said that the Unknown Sailor was the body of an engine room rating wearing  blue overalls.

For this reason, I think that the current efforts to identify the Unknown Sailor by finding his surviving relatives should be concentrating on those members of the crew who would most likely have been wearing blue overalls/boiler suit - not those members of the crew who would most likely have been wearing white overalls/boiler suit.

Recall from my first post on this topic that analysis of the fabric remnants from between press studs found upon the exhumation of the Unknown Sailor's remains was conducted at the Australian War Memorial, and the conclusion was that the colour of the fabric was white.  This together with the weave of the fabric led to the conclusion that the clothing had been of a type issued to officers, most likely in the Engineering branch.

Part Three coming soon.

My Photo
Blog powered by TypePad