I've noticed that feminists generally seem quite in favour of the now year-old Dove "campaign for real beauty".
Dana Boyd is quite proud of the part she unwittingly played in creating the viral buzz about the Dove evolution advertisment.
But Liz Funk wonders if ... well ... if the girls just haven't been had and
... or is Dove just taking advantage of a generation of young women without a solid grasp of media literacy who are eager to embrace a corporation who seems to be on their side?
I'm with Ms. Funk. What do you think?
Comments